Comments on: Apple admits AT&T pulled all GV apps http://www.seankovacs.com/2009/07/apple-admits-att-pulled-all-gv-apps/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=apple-admits-att-pulled-all-gv-apps Mobile Application Developement Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:23:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: ロレックス時計 http://www.seankovacs.com/2009/07/apple-admits-att-pulled-all-gv-apps/comment-page-2/#comment-4820 ロレックス時計 Tue, 10 May 2011 02:20:21 +0000 http://www.seankovacs.com/?p=440#comment-4820 <a href="http://www.toprolex.net/rolex" rel="nofollow">ロレックス時計</A>; <a href="http://www.toprolex.net/omega" rel="nofollow">オメガ時計</A>; <a href="http://www.toprolex.net/iwc" rel="nofollow">IWC腕時計</A> ロレックス時計;
オメガ時計;
IWC腕時計

]]> By: robert http://www.seankovacs.com/2009/07/apple-admits-att-pulled-all-gv-apps/comment-page-2/#comment-4819 robert Thu, 21 Apr 2011 01:50:47 +0000 http://www.seankovacs.com/?p=440#comment-4819 Thats why you should not get iphones Thats why you should not get iphones

]]> By: Carl http://www.seankovacs.com/2009/07/apple-admits-att-pulled-all-gv-apps/comment-page-2/#comment-4818 Carl Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:50:13 +0000 http://www.seankovacs.com/?p=440#comment-4818 This is why I like www.seankovacs.com. Shcoking posts. This is why I like http://www.seankovacs.com. Shcoking posts.

]]> By: Lucas http://www.seankovacs.com/2009/07/apple-admits-att-pulled-all-gv-apps/comment-page-2/#comment-4817 Lucas Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:33:32 +0000 http://www.seankovacs.com/?p=440#comment-4817 <a href="#comment-5199" rel="nofollow">@Nathan</a> nothing the guy told you is false. it is in the terms and conditions that all sales are final and nothing is guaranteed to be available for forever. not songs, movies or apps. the guy is doing his job. and within the limits of this job there is nothing more he can do. he gave you another route, which he probably didn't have to do. get off him and either shut up or take his suggestion. @Nathan nothing the guy told you is false. it is in the terms and conditions that all sales are final and nothing is guaranteed to be available for forever. not songs, movies or apps. the guy is doing his job. and within the limits of this job there is nothing more he can do. he gave you another route, which he probably didn’t have to do. get off him and either shut up or take his suggestion.

]]> By: appooglesoft http://www.seankovacs.com/2009/07/apple-admits-att-pulled-all-gv-apps/comment-page-2/#comment-4816 appooglesoft Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:35:07 +0000 http://www.seankovacs.com/?p=440#comment-4816 Somebody brought up a very good point on TechCrunch article yeerday concerning this. He said "This smart phone (iphone) is essentially a computer with operating system and an ability to install third party software like any other computer....Just imagine what would happen if Microsoft would make an agreement with Comcast and set up a list of software you are allowed to install. What if they allow you to connect to internet only through Comcast? What if Comcast decides they don’t like some software and a week later Microsoft would FORBID using it without any meaningful explanation? That would definitely be considered mafia-like behavior and nobody would tolerate it. We are not tolerating this behavior neither from China, US government, Microsoft, nor from Comcast. For how long are we going to tolerate this behavior from Apple? Also,.... Answers to numbers #1, 2, 3 and 5 can be found right here on this page. Sean keep up the good work. Questions from FCC letter to Apple 1. Why did Apple reject the Google Voice application for iPhone and remove related third-party applications from its App Store? In addition to Google Voice, which related third-party applications were removed or have been rejected? Please provide the specific name of each application and the contact information for the developer. 2. Did Apple act alone, or in consultation with AT&T, in deciding to reject the Google Voice application and related applications? If the latter, please describe the communications between Apple and AT&T in connection with the decision to reject Google Voice. Are there any contractual conditions or non-contractual understandings with AT&T that affected Apple’s decision in this matter? 3. Does AT&T have any role in the approval of iPhone applications generally (or in certain cases)? If so, under what circumstances, and what role does it play? What roles are specified in the contractual provisions between Apple and AT&T (or any non-contractual understandings) regarding the consideration of particular iPhone applications? 4. Please explain any differences between the Google Voice iPhone application and any Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) applications that Apple has approved for the iPhone. Are any of the approved VoIP applications allowed to operate on AT&T’s 3G network? 5. What other applications have been rejected for use on the iPhone and for what reasons? Is there a list of prohibited applications or of categories of applications that is provided to potential vendors/developers? If so, is this posted on the iTunes website or otherwise disclosed to consumers? 6. What are the standards for considering and approving iPhone applications? What is the approval process for such applications (timing, reasons for rejection, appeal process, etc.)? What is the percentage of applications that are rejected? What are the major reasons for rejecting an application? <a href="#comment-5248" rel="nofollow">@David</a> Somebody brought up a very good point on TechCrunch article yeerday concerning this. He said “This smart phone (iphone) is essentially a computer with operating system and an ability to install third party software like any other computer….Just imagine what would happen if Microsoft would make an agreement with Comcast and set up a list of software you are allowed to install. What if they allow you to connect to internet only through Comcast? What if Comcast decides they don’t like some software and a week later Microsoft would FORBID using it without any meaningful explanation? That would definitely be considered mafia-like behavior and nobody would tolerate it. We are not tolerating this behavior neither from China, US government, Microsoft, nor from Comcast. For how long are we going to tolerate this behavior from Apple?

Also,….

Answers to numbers #1, 2, 3 and 5 can be found right here on this page. Sean keep up the good work.

Questions from FCC letter to Apple

1. Why did Apple reject the Google Voice application for iPhone and
remove related third-party applications from its App Store? In addition to
Google Voice, which related third-party applications were removed or
have been rejected? Please provide the specific name of each application
and the contact information for the developer.

2. Did Apple act alone, or in consultation with AT&T, in deciding to reject
the Google Voice application and related applications? If the latter, please
describe the communications between Apple and AT&T in connection
with the decision to reject Google Voice. Are there any contractual
conditions or non-contractual understandings with AT&T that affected
Apple’s decision in this matter?

3. Does AT&T have any role in the approval of iPhone applications
generally (or in certain cases)? If so, under what circumstances, and what role does it play? What roles are specified in the contractual provisions
between Apple and AT&T (or any non-contractual understandings)
regarding the consideration of particular iPhone applications?

4. Please explain any differences between the Google Voice iPhone
application and any Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) applications that
Apple has approved for the iPhone. Are any of the approved VoIP
applications allowed to operate on AT&T’s 3G network?

5. What other applications have been rejected for use on the iPhone and for
what reasons? Is there a list of prohibited applications or of categories of
applications that is provided to potential vendors/developers? If so, is this
posted on the iTunes website or otherwise disclosed to consumers?

6. What are the standards for considering and approving iPhone
applications? What is the approval process for such applications (timing,
reasons for rejection, appeal process, etc.)? What is the percentage of
applications that are rejected? What are the major reasons for rejecting an
application?

@David

]]> By: appooglesoft http://www.seankovacs.com/2009/07/apple-admits-att-pulled-all-gv-apps/comment-page-2/#comment-4815 appooglesoft Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:33:56 +0000 http://www.seankovacs.com/?p=440#comment-4815 Somebody brought up a very good point on TechCrunch article yeerday concerning this. He said "This smart phone (iphone) is essentially a computer with operating system and an ability to install third party software like any other computer....Just imagine what would happen if Microsoft would make an agreement with Comcast and set up a list of software you are allowed to install. What if they allow you to connect to internet only through Comcast? What if Comcast decides they don’t like some software and a week later Microsoft would FORBID using it without any meaningful explanation? That would definitely be considered mafia-like behavior and nobody would tolerate it. We are not tolerating this behavior neither from China, US government, Microsoft, nor from Comcast. For how long are we going to tolerate this behavior from Apple? Also,.... Answers to numbers #1, 2, 3 and 5 can be found right here on this page. Sean keep up the good work. Questions from FCC letter to Apple 1. Why did Apple reject the Google Voice application for iPhone and remove related third-party applications from its App Store? In addition to Google Voice, which related third-party applications were removed or have been rejected? Please provide the specific name of each application and the contact information for the developer. 2. Did Apple act alone, or in consultation with AT&T, in deciding to reject the Google Voice application and related applications? If the latter, please describe the communications between Apple and AT&T in connection with the decision to reject Google Voice. Are there any contractual conditions or non-contractual understandings with AT&T that affected Apple’s decision in this matter? 3. Does AT&T have any role in the approval of iPhone applications generally (or in certain cases)? If so, under what circumstances, and what role does it play? What roles are specified in the contractual provisions between Apple and AT&T (or any non-contractual understandings) regarding the consideration of particular iPhone applications? 4. Please explain any differences between the Google Voice iPhone application and any Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) applications that Apple has approved for the iPhone. Are any of the approved VoIP applications allowed to operate on AT&T’s 3G network? 5. What other applications have been rejected for use on the iPhone and for what reasons? Is there a list of prohibited applications or of categories of applications that is provided to potential vendors/developers? If so, is this posted on the iTunes website or otherwise disclosed to consumers? 6. What are the standards for considering and approving iPhone applications? What is the approval process for such applications (timing, reasons for rejection, appeal process, etc.)? What is the percentage of applications that are rejected? What are the major reasons for rejecting an application? Somebody brought up a very good point on TechCrunch article yeerday concerning this. He said “This smart phone (iphone) is essentially a computer with operating system and an ability to install third party software like any other computer….Just imagine what would happen if Microsoft would make an agreement with Comcast and set up a list of software you are allowed to install. What if they allow you to connect to internet only through Comcast? What if Comcast decides they don’t like some software and a week later Microsoft would FORBID using it without any meaningful explanation? That would definitely be considered mafia-like behavior and nobody would tolerate it. We are not tolerating this behavior neither from China, US government, Microsoft, nor from Comcast. For how long are we going to tolerate this behavior from Apple?

Also,….

Answers to numbers #1, 2, 3 and 5 can be found right here on this page. Sean keep up the good work.

Questions from FCC letter to Apple

1. Why did Apple reject the Google Voice application for iPhone and
remove related third-party applications from its App Store? In addition to
Google Voice, which related third-party applications were removed or
have been rejected? Please provide the specific name of each application
and the contact information for the developer.

2. Did Apple act alone, or in consultation with AT&T, in deciding to reject
the Google Voice application and related applications? If the latter, please
describe the communications between Apple and AT&T in connection
with the decision to reject Google Voice. Are there any contractual
conditions or non-contractual understandings with AT&T that affected
Apple’s decision in this matter?

3. Does AT&T have any role in the approval of iPhone applications
generally (or in certain cases)? If so, under what circumstances, and what role does it play? What roles are specified in the contractual provisions
between Apple and AT&T (or any non-contractual understandings)
regarding the consideration of particular iPhone applications?

4. Please explain any differences between the Google Voice iPhone
application and any Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) applications that
Apple has approved for the iPhone. Are any of the approved VoIP
applications allowed to operate on AT&T’s 3G network?

5. What other applications have been rejected for use on the iPhone and for
what reasons? Is there a list of prohibited applications or of categories of
applications that is provided to potential vendors/developers? If so, is this
posted on the iTunes website or otherwise disclosed to consumers?

6. What are the standards for considering and approving iPhone
applications? What is the approval process for such applications (timing,
reasons for rejection, appeal process, etc.)? What is the percentage of
applications that are rejected? What are the major reasons for rejecting an
application?

]]> By: Tedious http://www.seankovacs.com/2009/07/apple-admits-att-pulled-all-gv-apps/comment-page-2/#comment-4814 Tedious Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:02:29 +0000 http://www.seankovacs.com/?p=440#comment-4814 <a href="#comment-5400" rel="nofollow">@ryusen</a> Apple cares about only ONE group: Tomorrow's hardware customer. Everyone else can suck it until they join this one group. @ryusen

Apple cares about only ONE group: Tomorrow’s hardware customer.

Everyone else can suck it until they join this one group.

]]> By: Google Voice App Pulled Following AT&T Request, Apple Support Person Claims [IPhone] | BestGadget.Info http://www.seankovacs.com/2009/07/apple-admits-att-pulled-all-gv-apps/comment-page-2/#comment-4813 Google Voice App Pulled Following AT&T Request, Apple Support Person Claims [IPhone] | BestGadget.Info Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:01:39 +0000 http://www.seankovacs.com/?p=440#comment-4813 [...] Kovacs claim he is getting a refund, that he is paying from his own purse. [Sean Kovacs] [...] [...] Kovacs claim he is getting a refund, that he is paying from his own purse. [Sean Kovacs] [...]

]]> By: KILLER FM.COM | The, Future Of Tech » Blog Archive » GBTV #604 http://www.seankovacs.com/2009/07/apple-admits-att-pulled-all-gv-apps/comment-page-2/#comment-4812 KILLER FM.COM | The, Future Of Tech » Blog Archive » GBTV #604 Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:38:41 +0000 http://www.seankovacs.com/?p=440#comment-4812 [...] released the MobileMe iDisk App, but they pulled the Google Voice apps. I’m none too happy about [...] [...] released the MobileMe iDisk App, but they pulled the Google Voice apps. I’m none too happy about [...]

]]> By: Apple Support: Google Voice Mobile App Removed At AT&T’s Request – SoftSailor http://www.seankovacs.com/2009/07/apple-admits-att-pulled-all-gv-apps/comment-page-2/#comment-4811 Apple Support: Google Voice Mobile App Removed At AT&T’s Request – SoftSailor Tue, 04 Aug 2009 08:52:43 +0000 http://www.seankovacs.com/?p=440#comment-4811 [...] via Sean Kovacs [...] [...] via Sean Kovacs [...]

]]>